| Homepage |
|
| Appearance of life, evolution of species, and emergence of man |
 |
| Understanding and levels of understanding |
|
| Consciousness and state of consciousness |
|
| Sense, communication, information, language of being |
|
| The Relativity |
|
| The time and the duration |
|
| physical potentialities, biological potentialities, intellectual potentialities … |
|
| Knowledges, truths, errors |
|
| Faith and Reason, Reason and Faith,…, the Thought |
|
| Inspirations, Appearances, Revelations |
|
| Soul, spiritual Identity |
|
| Death, Post-mortem Future, Eternal Life |
|
| Transcendent - God |
|
| Determinism, Normality, Universal constraints, Freedom |
|
| Contact |
| Site map |
|
|
|
The Relativity |
|
|
|
Page 6 sur 7
General Relativity for philosophers and theologians
The scientific experiments have to be servants of the philosophy and theology, but, in a research of primordial causes, it is necessary to get out of the monism which characterizes current interpretation of these experiments.
Aristotle would not contradict us.
------------------
Preliminary observations
As Lorentz's works reveal it, for an observer situated to a constant distance of the sun, twinkles of two broadcasting stations of photons piloted by two clocks strictly the same, the one situated on sun, the other one on earth, seem non simultaneous and it, because of the relative speed "earth - sun".
More exactly, this non-simultaneity is resulting of the interpretation of the respective perceptions,
an interpretation which necessitates evidently, transcendent order faculties.
But the philosophers and theologians seem to ignore this essential fact.
Another observation, when it is said :
"Fundamental property of the gravitational field is from transmitting to all bodies a same acceleration … ; if in a domain there is of the matter, only its inert mass, and so, only its energy is important in its production action of a field …" (cf. Relativity: The Special and General Theory – The solution of the Problem of Gravitation on the Basis of the General Principle of Relativity),
know that gravitational field does not transmit acceleration, it enables from transmitting to all bodies a same acceleration,
know that inert mass does not produce a field, but that a gravitational field is inexorably associated to the matter ,
what is very different.
In particular, gravitational field can be considered as expression, more exactly as conceptualization of a potential medium which enables coherence of the universal dynamics.
As a consequence, what is omnipresent realm of this potential medium, more generally of the forces and potentialities ?
A beyond the reality ?
We believe it ; according to us, it’s the implication domain of the Divine in the world that we named spacimplicatio.
Let us remember intuition of saint Denis :
"There is a nature who does not possess the being like other things, but who embraces and contains in herself very simply, and without any circumscription, all essence of the being, and in whom all things are contained as in a primordial and universal cause." (cf. Quoted by R. Descartes – Divine name - Metaphysical Meditations, first objections).
Today, objective of physicists is to unify the numerous concepts and theories, more and more esoteric, which feed relativist physics, quantum physics and cosmology.
However, even if they were succeeding in their work, we doubt of this, they would only unify theories,
of theories which necessitate, among other things, a creative entity for establishing them and judging them.
So, they would ignore the "essential facts".
They would ignore for example, timelessness, what does not have dimension as universal energy, ..., spiritual powers who although they necessitate physical structures for becoming realities (to express himself), nevertheless are of transcendent order.
Therefore let's go beyond the scientific monism,
and integrating partly, Einstein's theories, let's show why our perceptions's interpretation of the reality, is affected by relativity.
*
We judge the states of the reality by means of faculties which enable perceptions interpretation that we have of the things and events, thus the sea is quiet or agitated, an object seems to us light or heavy, big or small, such matter has more energy useful than an another, the fuel oil is more calorific than the wood, …
We are thus able from differentiating the energies between them and from estimating their interactions.
For example, we appreciate the impact of the thermic energy by comparing the temperatures ; such thing is then recognized warmer or colder, the "vector" of more or less of thermic energy.
It's the same for all the physical characters.
Let us remind that these interpretations presuppose virtualities comparison which "furnish" abstraction's domain : the images, concepts, ideas, feelings, …, value’s references,
of value’s references which can be estimated or measured only by comparison with negations ; that’s an inexorable fact of relative character which help to understand better, contrary's importance, negative's importance.
So, discontinuities and singularities of the things are expressed by multiple associations : "slow-fast", "negative-positive", …,"simple-complex ", " strong-weak", ...
On the other hand, these "bipoles", as we name them, are adapted to the complexity level of the beings.
Plants do not they react against the "light - obscurity", …, "warm - cold" ?,
evolved animals do not they recognize the healthy or harmful food, …, the good or bad master ?
With man, another subtle bipoles astonish more. How not to be surprised that we appreciate :
the freedom and constraint, the good and evil, the happiness and misfortune, the justice and injustice, the tolerance and intolerance, the honor and dishonor, the responsibility and irresponsibility, …,
and it, having no knowledge of the real world's nature,
and it, ignoring the primordial causes at origin of the things and beings ?
Another essential fact too, the moral values are interdependent ; thus, to the love we have to associate tolerance, justice, courage, ...,, and vice versa.
Having meditated on these diverse facts and contrary to what is said, at the present time,
henceforth we are convinced that innate information which emerge from consciousness state, as the value’s bipoles which are their singular expressions, in particular the bipoles of moral values, are not "born" from lived experiences.
This information have universal roots, although that disturbs humanists who recognize them only in man, or who imagine them inherent to Nature !
To this innate information is also associated imprescriptible presentiment of "abstract directions" :
towards more truth, kindness, justice, love, ..., and on the contrary, towards less truth, …
This fact leads evidently, to another interrogation :
why are we conscious of these abstract directions ?
Absolute of the relativity (of what is relative) these "auras" that light our choices and decisions,
are not they correlative of an imperious, primordial and universal necessity from creating ceaselessly, in a most coherent way ?
Do not they also testify to an implication of the man in world's dynamics ?
|
|
