Let's quote another essential fact that is never taken into consideration :
there is no contact between the molecules which compose the synaptic connections.
Indeed, the molecules, atoms and particles which compose this connections, are separated by immense spaces (by vacuums) as the cosmic objects (the stars, planets, ...).

Consequently, ineluctable question :
how the information and the biological processes organizations do they cross fathomless vacuums which separate the particles, atoms and molecules that compose the synaptic connections and the body ?,
and it, without modification (change) of the "sense".
We have already said it, it is possible by means of electromagnetic waves.
But, evidently, they have to be and recognized, and interpreted !

Regrettably, of great minds are satisfied with easy observations, as :
"When it takes place the illumination implies a considerable part of affectivity, and thus we cannot remain passive or indifferent. Every rare time that I have had it, I couldn't help having tears ..." (cf. Matter, thought - J.P. Changeux and Alain Connes),
even ambiguous and obscure :
"I think that the mathematician develops a sense, that we cannot reduce by sight, audition and touch, which enables him to perceive a reality with constraints but much more stable than a physical reality, because not localized in the space-time ..." (cf. Ibid.).
Where does it reside this reality not localized in the space ?

Digression as for the artificial intelligence.

Any structure which enables from treating digitized information,
for example, computer composed of "inert matter" or brain composed of "biologic matter",
distinguishes itself, in a first analysis, by two major characteristics :
- its capacity to do, in a minimum time, of successions of binary changes : of "0 to 1" or of "1 to 0 " (of non-activated state to activated state or of activated state to non-activated state).
For convenience, we chose the gobes as measure unit (10 power 9 operations, binary, elementary, per second).
- its memory counted by means of elementary units of information : the bits which are representative of the numbers "0" or "1" (non-activated or activated).

Let's take for example activity of photosensitive cells which constitute bottom of the eye (the rods and cones of the retina situated around visual axis).

Considering the processes which enable the digitalization, memorization and animated images,
and, knowing the difficulties for memorizing in a coherent way, characteristics of light's waves, for differentiating them, …, for mixing them and to compose in the abstraction's domain and according to innate processes, the virtual images which enable our world's understanding (processes much more complex than those used with the digital cameras),
it is reasonable to admit that analysis of a "image point" recognized by means of the eyes require at least 10 successive treatments per second,
every treatment necessitating 100 elementary binary operations,
and thus, for a photosensitive biologic cell, 1000 elementary binary operations per second.

On the other hand, seeing that every cell is a "pôle of interpretation" connected to brain,
and that our body is composed by more than 10.000 billion cells having a similar binary treatment activity to the one of the cones and rods of the retina,
the brain should enable from effecting more than 10 million of gobes.
This estimation seems to us however very below reality.

Indeed, into the cells take place of ceaseless creation activities which require, too, binary operations. Think to the immunization process ; in the cells are notably imagined, synthetized, experimented and utilized, according to lived experiences and universal references of value, molecules which must combat pathogenic agents,
molecules the structure of which will remain ignored, probably for ever, of the conscious understanding.
Without forgetting naturally, the concepts, ideas, anticipations, dreams, ..., that "furnish" our abstraction domain and which presuppose too data processings, ceaseless, with the corresponding binary operations.

If we want to evaluate number of "binary changes" which are treated by means of brain, it's therefore necessary to take into consideration working of this one.
That is why, knowing works of John C Ecclès, Nobel prize :

"The key activity of a synapse is that one of the synaptic vesicles liberates the transmitting substance which it contains : it’s an exocytosis ... A nervous impulse sends a large number of ions Ca ²⁺ in a button, thousands of times more than for the four ions Ca ²⁺ required for the exocytosis.
… the action of the mental intention is only the probability's modification of the vesicular emission of the synapses activated." (Cf. How the Self Controls Its Brain),

we retained estimations of Stuart Hammeroff :

"If we make hypothesis that microtubes are arranged in a parallel way and spaced of 100 nanometres, and that we take into consideration in cerebral volume what corresponds to neuronal cytoplasm, we obtain approximately 10 ¹⁴ microtubes in  human brain. If each of them can change of state all 10 ^-9 or all 10 ^-11 second, all cerebral microtubes thus have a processing capacity of information of about 10 ²³ to 10 ²⁵ bits per second. ".

The human brain could effect (can effect) so, at least, "10 power 14 " to "10 power 16 " gobes.
As for its capacities of memorisation, they are of much superior to that of the computers configurations,
and it especially since brain cannot be separated from all body's cells ; think for example, to myriads of processes organizations with biological effects, of processes organizations with behavioral effects, even with deadly effects, memorized on DNA and RNA.
As a consequence, it is utopian to want to know exactly, the "equivalent memory" of the inseparable set : "brain - body".
We consider nevertheless that it is amply superior to "10 power 25 " bits.

But then, what can we say about biggest computers, at this year 2009 ?

Except the military equipments, Blue Gene d' IBM would be one of the most powerful of the planet, with about 280 thousands of billions elementary binary operations per second (280 téraflops), and the National Centre For Scientific Research would have a set : "BlueGene/P – Power 6" of 207 téraflops (207 thousands gobes).
Nevertheless, the computers's capacity increase always ; IBM revealed its new great computer : Blue Gene/P capable of treating 3 million billions elementary binary operations per second, 3 petaflops, 3 millions gobes (compare with the first great computer conceived by Seymour Cray, in 1976, which was effecting only 160 millions elementary binary operations per second).

Our brain ("10 power 14" to "10 power 16" gobes), would be thus equivalent to more than 100 millions big computers which would enable, individually, of treating 1 petaflops (10 power 6 gobes) !
The supremacy of the human brain is obviously indisputable and it, although man cannot compete with the computers, in numerous domains.

Other main remarks :

- computer, of the inert matter, cannot judge and to take into consideration the sense of the words, letters, sentences, …, concepts, ideas, speechs, without softwares which express the man's faculties and man's intentions.
It’s a tool without consciousness of the things and which never set a problem ; a spirit, that of the man, has to make it for him.
In other words, reactivity and power of the computers depends on technologies that we have of the inert matter, their "intentions" are those of the men who make the softwares.

- when we remember ourselves a word, this one "emerges" almost always associated with several concepts, ideas, …, and past situations.
Memorized in precise and specific cerebral zones, and interconnected, the virtual objects thus express the formatting of the brain made in particular during the education and according to the lived experiences.
Consequently, how not to think to fragmentation that affects the hard disks after a long use and which slows down the computers's functioning ?,
how not to imagine the "defragmentation" of the brain ?,
defragmentations which could be, in certain cases, a therapy.
Of brains "better formated rather than too full",
Michel de Montaigne (1533 – 1592) would not contradict us !

- creative entity of transcendent order, master of the "sense", who executes and uses the elementary changes : "0 to 1" or of "1 to 0 " (non-activated state to activated state or of activated state to non-activated state) into brain, is too, directly implicated in body, by means of the micro softwares which are in the cells.

Each of you, thus can judge the intelligence level of the computers and the "contents" that we must give to concept of artificial intelligence, today.

So much essential facts that the proselytes of the artificial intelligence, do not said ! 
End of digression.

*

Curiously, theologians, although they recognize in revelation a transcendent dimension, have never discussed really of the abstraction's domain where are the feelings, the presentiments, the concepts, the ideas,..., the apparitions, the intuitions, the prophecies and the revelations,
of this domain of all time, where take place the activities of transcendent order, which enable us from understanding the world and from having responsibilities.

Moreover, let's repeat again, to example of the current intelligentsia, the theologians still consider that it is some laws which manage the universal dynamics as if this laws was able to recognize, judge, choose, ..., integrate the world's evolutions in rigorous chronologies, … and to act.
Inexcusable credulity nowadays, at dawn of the third millennium !
Unceasingly we show it,
we evolve in a cyberworld where "sense" is omnipresent,
we evolve in an eternal cyberuniverse, for ever unfinished, where permanently, a creative entity of divine character, is implicated.

It is true, some monotheist theologians have had this intuition ; it was nevertheless difficult for them to express it clearly. Let us quote st Gregory Palamas (1296 - 1359) an orthodox hermit who became archbishop of Thessalonica :
"Certainly, divinized men are not simply improved in their nature, but they receive also the divine energy: the Holy Spirit himself …
But, if it is so for the saints as it is for all creatures, in other words, if God, according to his subtle reflections, created the holiness into the saints in the same way that He created into the other beings the qualities which are convenient for them, why coming of J.C. on earth ? Once again, what need to send and to establish permanently the Spirit, from the beginning ? Indeed, He would have been in us and in the universe, but nevertheless God would be creative and deify." (cf. Of the divine and deifying participation or Of the divine and supernatural simplicity, 3).

What does remain of this realistic mysticism, of this Neoplatonism ?
Nothing ; this one was "swept" by an anthropocentric mysticism, often expressed by obscure speeches :

"There where, strong and alive, God, purpose of any life of the spirit, appears himself in front of the souls, his absolute power communicates itself in a quite spontaneous way to lived experiences, to statements and to options which concern Him. It is true for all religions, as well as for those which are big and sublime that for those which are confused and "poor". All think that they are absolute in their way to be ; they have the right of it as long as they have a spontaneous confidence in themselves ...
The absolute character of the rising historic religions is thus nothing else than the expression of the intimate and deep link that unites religions which are bearer of God's revelations, to God who express Himself by them ; this legitimacy of spontaneous pretensions to validity, is measuring itself in the redeeming force and liberating force which emanates from faith in them.",

"The God existence and his activity must not be seen or be proved according to world, nature or a small part of the earth history which are known … God only can make, that we know Him by means of the internal sensation and the certainty of the things's whole and of his Being, a fact that we call religious feeling or religious sensation and that precisely we consider clearly as God's presence in us." (cf. Ernest Troeltsch who inspired neo-Protestantism - a text published in 1913 : Revelation).

Let us be clear and precise.

We can henceforth show the permanent implication in world, of a creative entity who in spite of her divine character is not omnipotent, it would be only because she cannot surmount universal constraints and because in us, she has to work for knowing and researching to know more.
This not omnipotent entity leads us therefore to recognition out of necessity, of an absolute reference, of a Supreme Transcendent Power that we name God.
So and regrettably, of God we know nothing other !

Mysteriously also, this creative entity delegates to every man, a tiny part of her responsibility since she recognizes herself in the I (ego, subject, spirit).
In particular, man cannot have a world's knowledge without "emergences" from his consciousness state, of more or less precise and subtle revelations.
The first of this revelations, is not it the one which enables to baby, at about twenty months, from becoming conscious of himself by recognizing himself in a mirror ?

But then, are we pantheists when we consider that God, the creative Entity of divine character (the "Divine") who manages universal dynamics, and universe, are expressing permanent interactions ?
Certainly not.
In the cyberworld of sacrificial character where we evolve, there are permanent interactions between what is real and what is potential, physical and spiritual, immanent and transcendent, temporal and eternal.
It’s why world is not God, no more than the "Divine" is "matter", no more than the "Divine" is God !

Evidently, the scientific theories and the philosophic and theological speeches will never enable "to penetrate" into the domains, the "orders", the "essences", according to us the entities without dimension, who are sources of the powers and interactions which, eternally, enable world's diversity, we want to speak of :
- the entity without dimension who is source of the energies and matter ; it is the universal energy about which all the scientists speak without nevertheless, to know her,
- the order of divine character who is source of the creative transcendent entity who, in and by us, theorizes and makes discourses.

Only some implication relations of the "Divine" in world, are accessible to the conscious understanding,
but we have to look for them so that they enable plenitude of our spiritual life !

Paul   Moyne